2003 Ford C-MAX vs. 1956 Rover P4
To start off, 2003 Ford C-MAX is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,636 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Rover P4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford C-MAX (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1956 Rover P4. (108 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1956 Rover P4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Rover P4 weights approximately 26 kg more than 2003 Ford C-MAX.
Because 1956 Rover P4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Rover P4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Rover P4 (206 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford C-MAX. (175 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1956 Rover P4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford C-MAX.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford C-MAX | 1956 Rover P4 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | C-MAX | P4 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 2636 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 206 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.1 mm | 105 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1422 kg | 1448 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 52 L |