2003 Ford C-MAX vs. 1959 Marcos GT
To start off, 2003 Ford C-MAX is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Marcos GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Marcos GT would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford C-MAX (144 HP) has 85 more horse power than 1959 Marcos GT. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1959 Marcos GT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 998 kg more than 1959 Marcos GT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Marcos GT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Marcos GT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford C-MAX | 1959 Marcos GT | |
Make | Ford | Marcos |
Model | C-MAX | GT |
Year Released | 2003 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 144 HP | 59 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1392 kg | 394 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2220 mm |