2003 Ford C-MAX vs. 1959 Nissan 211
To start off, 2003 Ford C-MAX is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Nissan 211. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Nissan 211 would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford C-MAX (110 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1959 Nissan 211. (34 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1959 Nissan 211. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 401 kg more than 1959 Nissan 211. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford C-MAX (245 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Nissan 211. (66 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2003 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Nissan 211.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford C-MAX | 1959 Nissan 211 | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | C-MAX | 211 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1959 |
Engine Size | 1560 cc | 988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 66 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 925 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2230 mm |