2003 Ford C-MAX vs. 1959 Riley 4-68
To start off, 2003 Ford C-MAX is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Riley 4-68. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Riley 4-68 would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford C-MAX (110 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1959 Riley 4-68. (63 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1959 Riley 4-68. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 234 kg more than 1959 Riley 4-68. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Riley 4-68 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Riley 4-68. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford C-MAX (245 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Riley 4-68. (115 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2003 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Riley 4-68.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford C-MAX | 1959 Riley 4-68 | |
Make | Ford | Riley |
Model | C-MAX | 4-68 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1560 cc | 1489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.3 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 8.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1092 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2530 mm |