2003 Ford C-MAX vs. 1961 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2003 Ford C-MAX is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,753 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford C-MAX (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1961 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1961 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 337 kg more than 1961 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford C-MAX (175 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2003 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford C-MAX | 1961 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | C-MAX | Cedric |
Year Released | 2003 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1422 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2540 mm |