2003 Ford C-MAX vs. 1961 Volvo 220
To start off, 2003 Ford C-MAX is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Volvo 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford C-MAX (110 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1961 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1961 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 311 kg more than 1961 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford C-MAX (245 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2003 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford C-MAX | 1961 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | C-MAX | 220 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1560 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2610 mm |