2003 Ford C-MAX vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2003 Ford C-MAX is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,753 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford C-MAX (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 922 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford C-MAX (175 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2003 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford C-MAX | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | C-MAX | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 1753 cc | 358 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1422 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2060 mm |
