2003 Ford C-MAX vs. 1964 Toyota Corona
To start off, 2003 Ford C-MAX is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford C-MAX (110 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1964 Toyota Corona. (83 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1964 Toyota Corona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 356 kg more than 1964 Toyota Corona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Toyota Corona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Toyota Corona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford C-MAX (245 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Toyota Corona. (118 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Toyota Corona.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford C-MAX | 1964 Toyota Corona | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | C-MAX | Corona |
Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1560 cc | 1453 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 77.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.3 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2510 mm |