2003 Ford C-MAX vs. 1965 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2003 Ford C-MAX is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford C-MAX (110 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 826 kg more than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford C-MAX (245 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2003 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford C-MAX | 1965 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | C-MAX | Fronte |
Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 1560 cc | 360 cc |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 32 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2060 mm |