2003 Ford C-MAX vs. 1967 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2003 Ford C-MAX is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford C-MAX (110 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1967 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1967 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 471 kg more than 1967 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford C-MAX | 1967 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Ford | Zastava |
| Model | C-MAX | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1967 |
| Engine Size | 1560 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2010 mm |
