2003 Ford C-MAX vs. 1975 Reliant Kitten
To start off, 2003 Ford C-MAX is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Reliant Kitten. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Reliant Kitten would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford C-MAX (110 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1975 Reliant Kitten. (39 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1975 Reliant Kitten. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 788 kg more than 1975 Reliant Kitten. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1975 Reliant Kitten is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Reliant Kitten. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford C-MAX (245 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Reliant Kitten. (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Reliant Kitten.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford C-MAX | 1975 Reliant Kitten | |
Make | Ford | Reliant |
Model | C-MAX | Kitten |
Year Released | 2003 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1560 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 39 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 63 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 62.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.3 mm | 69.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 538 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2150 mm |