2003 Ford C-MAX vs. 1975 Suzuki LJ 20
To start off, 2003 Ford C-MAX is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Suzuki LJ 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Suzuki LJ 20 would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford C-MAX (110 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1975 Suzuki LJ 20. (27 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1975 Suzuki LJ 20.
Because 1975 Suzuki LJ 20 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford C-MAX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Suzuki LJ 20 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford C-MAX (245 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Suzuki LJ 20. (37 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2003 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Suzuki LJ 20.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford C-MAX | 1975 Suzuki LJ 20 | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | C-MAX | LJ 20 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1975 |
| Engine Size | 1560 cc | 359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 37 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
