2003 Ford C-MAX vs. 1985 Nissan AZ-1
To start off, 2003 Ford C-MAX is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Nissan AZ-1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Nissan AZ-1 would be higher. At 2,950 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Nissan AZ-1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Nissan AZ-1 (195 HP) has 67 more horse power than 2003 Ford C-MAX. (128 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Nissan AZ-1 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford C-MAX.
Because 1985 Nissan AZ-1 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford C-MAX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Nissan AZ-1 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Nissan AZ-1 (277 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford C-MAX. (175 Nm). This means 1985 Nissan AZ-1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford C-MAX.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford C-MAX | 1985 Nissan AZ-1 | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | C-MAX | AZ-1 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1985 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 2950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 195 HP |
Torque | 175 Nm | 277 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2440 mm |