2003 Ford C-MAX vs. 1993 Jaguar XJS
To start off, 2003 Ford C-MAX is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 3,980 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Jaguar XJS (222 HP) has 94 more horse power than 2003 Ford C-MAX. (128 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford C-MAX.
Because 1993 Jaguar XJS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Jaguar XJS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford C-MAX | 1993 Jaguar XJS | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | C-MAX | XJS |
Year Released | 2003 | 1993 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 3980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 222 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 82 L |