2003 Ford C-MAX vs. 1994 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2003 Ford C-MAX is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford C-MAX (144 HP) has 77 more horse power than 1994 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 426 kg more than 1994 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford C-MAX (344 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford C-MAX | 1994 Mazda Midge | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | C-MAX | Midge |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1323 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 144 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 344 Nm | 101 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1392 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1400 mm |
