2003 Ford C-MAX vs. 1999 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 2003 Ford C-MAX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,610 cc, 1999 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda RX-01 (217 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 2003 Ford C-MAX. (110 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford C-MAX.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford C-MAX (245 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda RX-01. (216 Nm @ 6500 RPM). This means 2003 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford C-MAX | 1999 Mazda RX-01 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | C-MAX | RX-01 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1560 cc | 2610 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 216 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2350 mm |