2003 Ford C-MAX vs. 1999 Renault Zo

To start off, 2003 Ford C-MAX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Zo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Zo would be higher. Both 2003 Ford C-MAX and 1999 Renault Zo are equipped with a 1,999 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford C-MAX (144 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1999 Renault Zo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Zo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Renault Zo weights approximately 183 kg more than 2003 Ford C-MAX.

Because 1999 Renault Zo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Renault Zo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford C-MAX (344 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Renault Zo. (260 Nm). This means 2003 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Renault Zo. 1999 Renault Zo has automatic transmission and 2003 Ford C-MAX has manual transmission. 2003 Ford C-MAX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Renault Zo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: