2003 Ford C-MAX vs. 2001 Nissan MM
To start off, 2003 Ford C-MAX is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan MM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan MM would be higher. At 2,956 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Nissan MM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Nissan MM (153 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2003 Ford C-MAX. (110 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Nissan MM should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford C-MAX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan MM weights approximately 509 kg more than 2003 Ford C-MAX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan MM (372 Nm) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford C-MAX. (245 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan MM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford C-MAX. 2001 Nissan MM has automatic transmission and 2003 Ford C-MAX has manual transmission. 2003 Ford C-MAX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Nissan MM will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford C-MAX | 2001 Nissan MM | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | C-MAX | MM |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1560 cc | 2956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 372 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1835 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 1530 mm |
