2003 Ford C-MAX vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer

To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford C-MAX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford C-MAX would be higher. At 2,341 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2003 Ford C-MAX. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford C-MAX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 42 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (220 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford C-MAX. (175 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford C-MAX.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Ford C-MAX 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer
Make Ford Mitsubishi
Model C-MAX Lancer
Year Released 2003 2004
Body Type Minivan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1753 cc 2341 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 128 HP 160 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 175 Nm 220 Nm
Engine Bore Size 83 mm 87 mm
Engine Stroke Size 83.1 mm 100 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.0:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1422 kg 1380 kg
Vehicle Length 4340 mm 4610 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1600 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2610 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 59 L 50 L