2003 Ford C-MAX vs. 2010 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2010 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford C-MAX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford C-MAX would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Proton Gen-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford C-MAX (110 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2010 Proton Gen-2. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 2010 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford C-MAX (245 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford C-MAX | 2010 Proton Gen-2 | |
Make | Ford | Proton |
Model | C-MAX | Gen-2 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 1560 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2610 mm |