2003 Ford C-MAX vs. 2011 Opel Combo
To start off, 2011 Opel Combo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford C-MAX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford C-MAX would be higher. At 1,753 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford C-MAX (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2011 Opel Combo. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 2011 Opel Combo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford C-MAX (175 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Opel Combo. (126 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Opel Combo.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford C-MAX | 2011 Opel Combo | |
Make | Ford | Opel |
Model | C-MAX | Combo |
Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 73.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.1 mm | 80.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 52 L |