2003 Ford C-MAX vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford C-MAX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford C-MAX would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Clio (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2003 Ford C-MAX. (110 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford C-MAX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 111 kg more than 2012 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford C-MAX (245 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Clio. (151 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2003 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Clio. 2012 Renault Clio has automatic transmission and 2003 Ford C-MAX has manual transmission. 2003 Ford C-MAX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Renault Clio will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford C-MAX | 2012 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | C-MAX | Clio |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1560 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 151 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.3 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1215 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2580 mm |