2003 Ford Crown Victoria vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 2003 Ford Crown Victoria is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Crown Victoria is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Crown Victoria weights approximately 1202 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Crown Victoria (361 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 314 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Crown Victoria will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Crown Victoria | 1965 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Ford | Seat |
| Model | Crown Victoria | 600 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4601 cc | 767 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 221 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 361 Nm | 47 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1777 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2010 mm |
