2003 Ford Econoline vs. 1960 Renault Juva
To start off, 2003 Ford Econoline is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Renault Juva would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1545 kg more than 1960 Renault Juva.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Econoline | 1960 Renault Juva | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Econoline | Juva |
Year Released | 2003 | 1960 |
Body Type | Van | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 845 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1410 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2360 mm |