2003 Ford Econoline vs. 1963 Lotus Elite
To start off, 2003 Ford Econoline is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elite. (83 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1745 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Econoline | 1963 Lotus Elite | |
| Make | Ford | Lotus |
| Model | Econoline | Elite |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1963 |
| Body Type | Van | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1216 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1180 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2240 mm |
