2003 Ford Econoline vs. 1970 Plymouth Barracuda
To start off, 2003 Ford Econoline is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Plymouth Barracuda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Plymouth Barracuda would be higher. At 5,563 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Plymouth Barracuda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Plymouth Barracuda (290 HP) has 93 more horse power than 2003 Ford Econoline. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Plymouth Barracuda should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Econoline.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Plymouth Barracuda (468 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm). This means 1970 Plymouth Barracuda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Econoline | 1970 Plymouth Barracuda | |
| Make | Ford | Plymouth |
| Model | Econoline | Barracuda |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 5563 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 290 HP |
| Torque | 338 Nm | 468 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2700 mm |
