2003 Ford Econoline vs. 1979 Skoda L
To start off, 2003 Ford Econoline is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Skoda L would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1979 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1979 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1500 kg more than 1979 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 264 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Econoline | 1979 Skoda L | |
| Make | Ford | Skoda |
| Model | Econoline | L |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1046 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 338 Nm | 74 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 825 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2410 mm |
