2003 Ford Econoline vs. 1981 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2003 Ford Econoline is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1981 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1425 kg more than 1981 Jaguar XJR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Econoline | 1981 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Econoline | XJR |
Year Released | 2003 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 5343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1050 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2870 mm |