2003 Ford Econoline vs. 1982 Renault 9
To start off, 2003 Ford Econoline is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 9 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (55 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1410 kg more than 1982 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Renault 9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Renault 9. (104 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Renault 9.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Econoline | 1982 Renault 9 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Econoline | 9 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 55 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 104 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2410 mm |