2003 Ford Econoline vs. 1983 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 2003 Ford Econoline is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Toyota Corolla. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Toyota Corolla would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1983 Toyota Corolla. (122 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1983 Toyota Corolla.
Because 2003 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Toyota Corolla, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Toyota Corolla. (143 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Toyota Corolla.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Econoline | 1983 Toyota Corolla | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Econoline | Corolla |
Year Released | 2003 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 143 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2410 mm |