2003 Ford Econoline vs. 1984 Volvo 740
To start off, 2003 Ford Econoline is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Volvo 740. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Volvo 740 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 197 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econoline weights approximately 885 kg more than 1984 Volvo 740.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Volvo 740. (296 Nm @ 2950 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Volvo 740.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Econoline | 1984 Volvo 740 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Econoline | 740 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 296 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 2950 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2780 mm |