2003 Ford Econoline vs. 1995 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2003 Ford Econoline is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 4,973 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mercedes-Benz E (347 HP) has 150 more horse power than 2003 Ford Econoline. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econoline weights approximately 275 kg more than 1995 Mercedes-Benz E.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mercedes-Benz E (480 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm). This means 1995 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Econoline | 1995 Mercedes-Benz E | |
| Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Econoline | E |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 4973 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 347 HP |
| Torque | 338 Nm | 480 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 2050 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2850 mm |
