2003 Ford Econoline vs. 2000 Jaguar XKA
To start off, 2003 Ford Econoline is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar XKA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar XKA would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKA (466 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 269 more horse power than 2003 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKA should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econoline weights approximately 525 kg more than 2000 Jaguar XKA.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XKA (843 Nm) has 505 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XKA will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Econoline | 2000 Jaguar XKA | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Econoline | XKA |
Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 4399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 466 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 843 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1800 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2590 mm |