2003 Ford Econoline vs. 2002 Jaguar S-Type
To start off, 2003 Ford Econoline is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar S-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar S-Type would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar S-Type (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2003 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar S-Type should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econoline weights approximately 590 kg more than 2002 Jaguar S-Type.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar S-Type (420 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2002 Jaguar S-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Econoline | 2002 Jaguar S-Type | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Econoline | S-Type |
Year Released | 2003 | 2002 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 4193 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 420 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1735 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3000 mm |