2003 Ford Econoline vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Raider

To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (230 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2003 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1150 kg more than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider.

Because 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (393 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Raider will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Econoline.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Ford Econoline 2006 Mitsubishi Raider
Make Ford Mitsubishi
Model Econoline Raider
Year Released 2003 2006
Body Type Van Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4195 cc 4703 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 197 HP 230 HP
Engine RPM 4700 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 338 Nm 393 Nm
Torque RPM 2700 RPM 3600 RPM
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Vehicle Weight 2325 kg 1175 kg
Vehicle Length 5390 mm 5590 mm
Vehicle Width 2020 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 2060 mm 1750 mm
Wheelbase Size 3510 mm 3340 mm