2003 Ford Econoline vs. 2006 Toyota Sienna
To start off, 2006 Toyota Sienna is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Sienna (215 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2003 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Sienna should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Econoline.
Because 2003 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Sienna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota Sienna. (301 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota Sienna.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Econoline | 2006 Toyota Sienna | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Econoline | Sienna |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Van | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3308 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 215 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 338 Nm | 301 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1970 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3040 mm |
