2003 Ford Econoline vs. 2008 Ford Taurus X

To start off, 2008 Ford Taurus X is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Taurus X (264 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2003 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Taurus X should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1248 kg more than 2008 Ford Taurus X.

Because 2003 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Taurus X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 338 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Ford Econoline 2008 Ford Taurus X
Make Ford Ford
Model Econoline Taurus X
Year Released 2003 2008
Body Type Van Crossover
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4195 cc 3496 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 197 HP 264 HP
Engine RPM 4700 RPM 6250 RPM
Torque 338 Nm 338 Nm
Torque RPM 2700 RPM 4500 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Vehicle Weight 2325 kg 1077 kg
Vehicle Length 5390 mm 5090 mm
Vehicle Width 2020 mm 1910 mm
Vehicle Height 2060 mm 1720 mm
Wheelbase Size 3510 mm 2870 mm