2003 Ford Econoline vs. 2009 GMC Savana
To start off, 2009 GMC Savana is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2009 GMC Savana. (195 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 2009 GMC Savana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 GMC Savana weights approximately 252 kg more than 2003 Ford Econoline.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 GMC Savana (353 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2009 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Econoline | 2009 GMC Savana | |
Make | Ford | GMC |
Model | Econoline | Savana |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Body Type | Van | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 4300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 2577 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 2080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3440 mm |