2003 Ford Econoline vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2010 Audi TT. (168 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 2010 Audi TT.
Because 2010 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi TT (350 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2010 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Econoline | 2010 Audi TT | |
| Make | Ford | Audi |
| Model | Econoline | TT |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Van | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 338 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4201 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1359 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2469 mm |
