2003 Ford Econoline vs. 2010 GMC Canyon
To start off, 2010 GMC Canyon is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2010 GMC Canyon. (182 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 2010 GMC Canyon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 GMC Canyon. (190 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Econoline | 2010 GMC Canyon | |
Make | Ford | GMC |
Model | Econoline | Canyon |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Body Type | Van | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2830 mm |