2003 Ford Econoline vs. 2011 GMC Yukon

To start off, 2011 GMC Yukon is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 GMC Yukon (403 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 2003 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 GMC Yukon weights approximately 348 kg more than 2003 Ford Econoline. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 GMC Yukon (565 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2011 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Econoline.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Ford Econoline 2011 GMC Yukon
Make Ford GMC
Model Econoline Yukon
Year Released 2003 2011
Body Type Van SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4195 cc 6200 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 197 HP 403 HP
Engine RPM 4700 RPM 5700 RPM
Torque 338 Nm 565 Nm
Torque RPM 2700 RPM 4300 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Flex Fuel
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 2325 kg 2673 kg
Vehicle Length 5390 mm 5649 mm
Vehicle Width 2020 mm 2009 mm
Vehicle Height 2060 mm 1951 mm
Wheelbase Size 3510 mm 3302 mm