2003 Ford Econoline vs. 2011 Nissan Frontier
To start off, 2011 Nissan Frontier is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Frontier (261 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2003 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Frontier should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Econoline.
Because 2011 Nissan Frontier is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Frontier will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Frontier (381 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2011 Nissan Frontier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Econoline | 2011 Nissan Frontier | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Econoline | Frontier |
Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
Body Type | Van | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 261 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 381 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3200 mm |