2003 Ford Econoline vs. 2012 Lexus GS
To start off, 2012 Lexus GS is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Lexus GS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Lexus GS (342 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 2003 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Lexus GS should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econoline weights approximately 536 kg more than 2012 Lexus GS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Lexus GS (459 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2012 Lexus GS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Econoline | 2012 Lexus GS | |
| Make | Ford | Lexus |
| Model | Econoline | GS |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Van | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 342 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 338 Nm | 459 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1789 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4826 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1821 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1425 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2850 mm |
