2003 Ford Econoline vs. 2012 Renault Latitude
To start off, 2012 Renault Latitude is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Econoline would be higher.
Because 2003 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Latitude, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Econoline | 2012 Renault Latitude | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Econoline | Latitude |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4897 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1832 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2760 mm |