2003 Ford Econoline vs. 2012 Toyota RAV4
To start off, 2012 Toyota RAV4 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Toyota RAV4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota RAV4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Econoline | 2012 Toyota RAV4 | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Econoline | RAV4 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |