2003 Ford Econovan vs. 1961 Steyr 700C
To start off, 2003 Ford Econovan is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Steyr 700C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Steyr 700C would be higher. At 1,789 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Econovan (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1961 Steyr 700C. (24 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Econovan should accelerate faster than 1961 Steyr 700C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econovan weights approximately 755 kg more than 1961 Steyr 700C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Econovan (139 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Steyr 700C. (41 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Econovan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Steyr 700C.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Econovan | 1961 Steyr 700C | |
| Make | Ford | Steyr |
| Model | Econovan | 700C |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1961 |
| Engine Size | 1789 cc | 643 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 41 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1330 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 1950 mm |
