2003 Ford Econovan vs. 1962 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2003 Ford Econovan is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 1,789 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Lotus Seven (94 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2003 Ford Econovan. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Lotus Seven should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econovan weights approximately 825 kg more than 1962 Lotus Seven.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Econovan | 1962 Lotus Seven | |
| Make | Ford | Lotus |
| Model | Econovan | Seven |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
| Body Type | Van | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1789 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2240 mm |
