2003 Ford Econovan vs. 1970 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2003 Ford Econovan is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1970 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2003 Ford Econovan. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econovan weights approximately 355 kg more than 1970 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Econovan (139 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Mazda Cosmo. (134 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Econovan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Econovan | 1970 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Econovan | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2003 | 1970 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 134 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2210 mm |