2003 Ford Econovan vs. 1975 Reliant Scimitar

To start off, 2003 Ford Econovan is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Reliant Scimitar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Reliant Scimitar would be higher. At 2,994 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Reliant Scimitar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Reliant Scimitar (135 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2003 Ford Econovan. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1975 Reliant Scimitar should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econovan weights approximately 29 kg more than 1975 Reliant Scimitar.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Reliant Scimitar (236 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Econovan. (139 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1975 Reliant Scimitar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Econovan.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Ford Econovan 1975 Reliant Scimitar
Make Ford Reliant
Model Econovan Scimitar
Year Released 2003 1975
Body Type Van Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1789 cc 2994 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 90 HP 135 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 139 Nm 236 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1295 kg 1266 kg
Vehicle Length 4290 mm 4450 mm
Vehicle Width 1640 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1870 mm 1330 mm
Wheelbase Size 2210 mm 2640 mm