2003 Ford Econovan vs. 1976 Renault 15
To start off, 2003 Ford Econovan is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Renault 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Renault 15 would be higher. At 1,789 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Renault 15 (98 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2003 Ford Econovan. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Renault 15 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econovan weights approximately 235 kg more than 1976 Renault 15.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Econovan (139 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Renault 15. (135 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Econovan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Renault 15.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Econovan | 1976 Renault 15 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Econovan | 15 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1789 cc | 1647 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 98 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1060 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2450 mm |
